Artificial intelligence can revolutionize everything from the administrator to health care, but would you entrust it to your legal matters? According to a new survey by the legal director, half of the adults in Great Britain – a statement that triggered both fascination and concerns in the entire legal sector.

The survey showed that 50% of the British would contact AI through a traditional lawyer due to legal decision -making, and another 56% would trust that they interpret contracts or conditions. This number increased in younger respondents and men with 55% of men and over 60% of the gene Z that they would rely on the legal guidance on AI. In contrast, only 39% of the more than 75s would consider this.

The most surprising said a third of the respondents said that they would trust KI to friends for legal advice, while almost half of the (46%) stated to use them before looking for health advice. While the appetite for digital decision -making increases, experts are caution.

Kiley Tan, a lawyer of the legal director, warned that AI tools – in particular large language models that are not trained on verified legal material – are not yet suitable for the purpose in a legal context. “Legal services can be expensive, and there is no doubt that the AI ​​appears to be a clever problem bypass. But the results, even though they are convincing, can be wild,” he said. “And legally, Close is not good enough.”

Tan also pointed out that most contracts are not publicly available, and therefore fall outside the data records on which most AI systems are trained. This lack of access to real legal documents limits the ability of the AI ​​to give well -founded advice or to remove enforceable contracts.

While Tech Evangelists praise the AI ​​for their speed and cost efficiency, the survey showed that confidence in AI drops significantly when the tasks become more personal or more consistent. Two thirds of the respondents stated that they would not have AI perform an operation about themselves or a loved one. Over half would not trust to plan your wedding or to cope with your bills.

Sarah Clark, Chief Revenue Officer of the legal director, repeated these concerns: “AI is brilliant in sorting data and automating the administrator, but when it comes to right, nuance matters. Context, consequences, emotional insight – all are of crucial importance when it comes to interpreting the law or negotiating a legally result.”

Even with the technical and technical demographic nenes aged 18 to 29 years-there is skepticism. While they were probably most likely to be considered for the legal support, 43% still stated that they would not fully trust him, and almost 40% would not rely on AI to read a contract in their name.

Ultimately, only 15% of the British public stated to trust AI that they would carry out all the tasks they were asked – a clear indication that human touch in areas is still important.

While AI continues her march into professional services, the message of the legal world is clear: Use technology to help not replace. At the moment when it comes to navigating legal complexity, there is still no replacement for the trained eye of a human expert.