The appearance of AI

In recent years we have witnessed the creation of AI, with many AI companies who want to take part in the effects with little consideration. Content is one. In a way, that’s the last thing we need. More content. From AI.

It doesn’t just increase the Signal noise Relationship It hurls the water for everyone.

In short, KI content is shit.

• The sound is switched off

• It is subject to hallucination (or facts if they are not)

• It is essentially invented in terms of content without the sources to be attributed

• Humanity is missing (real examples or “experience” or “nuance”)

Add them together and it is easier to see that it is simply not a good content.

For those who want to use AI to create content, I would suggest that they are considering an alternative way. I would also argue that there is a strong chance that Google will ultimately punish the content of AI -generated AI -generated people -not for strong moral reasons, but only because it is bad for business. I am sure I’m not alone in Press the back button As soon as I realized that I created content.

All that said. I am all in favor of using AI as a complement (in contrast to a replacement). I would argue that the following are good use of AI for creating content.

• Theme thoughts

• Content structure

• Summarize text

• Spelling (or grammar) checks

• Facts examination (although Google is probably more reliable)

• Procurement of a quote (once attributed).

• Help with optimizing content for SEO

We are all faced with the choice.

I am in favor of calling BS on AI created content and calling it out. After all, it is never good to pee into the pond, and that’s exactly what.

As a manager, you ensure that those who work in marketing functions understand that the public content of AI generated is not acceptable. (I kept the legalities away here, but there are growing examples of companies that try to blame AI for factual inaccuracies in published content. I am not sure whether the argument will be much fluctuating).

And next time LinkedIn encourages you to start a contribution, just try to write it with AI. I even try to see if I can create an #Ai BS Hash Day and get it into trend.

Summary

This seems to be a swing against AI in a world that drowns in new AI applications, it is not intended. I draw the line with AI produced content. I’m sure I’m not alone.

Would you like to really publish content with low value that may have technical inaccuracies that can ultimately be punished by Google in a future algorithm update in a future algorithm update?